Thanks for your question! Yes!!!! You are exactly right that the video and especially the reference to the Desert Abbas' apothegm crystalizes the value of stability in monastic life. Though I have heard some misunderstand the meaning of stability when used in this regard, it does not refer to emotional stability, or "stabilizing one's emotions." Instead it refers to the practice of monastics to make profession in one monastery and commit to staying there for the rest of one's life unless one is sent to help found another monastic house.
The fundamental spiritual insight into this value is rooted in the recognition that while one remains in the same place or continues the same basic rhythm and pattern of behavior (horarium) day in and day out, one will go deeper and deeper in one's relation to one's true self and one's relationship with God. Those who profess (or otherwise practice) monastic stability are convinced that everything they truly need is found here in this monastery. The monk binds himself to this faith community and to learning to love in concrete ways, to forgive, and allow himself to be shaped by his brothers' needs and concerns. When coupled with the other vows and values of monastic life, the monk or hermit is led more and more to attend to God as the one thing necessary.
A hermit practicing this form of stability in her hermitage can go a couple of different ways. The first is not the way the hermit is meant to go, but it can happen without competent spiritual direction. This is the way of self-centeredness and dissipation. In the search for God (seeking God), one can find oneself unable to focus and turn to book after book after book (for instance) without going particularly deep. Bishop Varden speaks about this, whether in the video I provided or another one in the series, when the monk treats the monastery library as a kind of buffet and nibbles at every author, every Church Father, or Doctor of the Church, but truly fails to eat and drink deeply from any one of them.Similarly, one can focus on this external fault or flaw and then another one and then another one, without ever reaching the reason for the fault or flaw that resides much deeper within the person. I have heard hermits "paper over" their own deep woundedness or illness with confessions of their more superficial faults and then celebrate God's (unfortunately) equally superficial forgiveness. I remember one online solitary who took these patterns and added the practice of making videos where he would read a bit of this author or that one. He sometimes confessed this flaw or that one in himself, and then, because the videos (which had become more frequent) seemed to demand this, moved on to new material. What seemed to be missing was any deep engagement with or understanding of the texts themselves, their unfamiliar authors, or the God the texts sought to put one in touch with. This kind of approach is a form of monastic or eremitic dilettantism and is antithetical to monastic stability.
The second way a monastic or hermit can go within their monastery or hermitage is deeper. While one is apt to read widely as a monastic/hermit, so too is one apt to become very well read and expert in a period of history, a particular author, certain topics, etc. In my own life I can look at several topics that have interested me for decades now: chronic illness as vocation and sometimes as eremitical vocation, the redemption of isolation which we then recognize as the silence of solitude, c 603 as an ecclesial vocation, the discernment and formation of such vocations, and the Theology of the Cross and God's will to be Emmanuel -- God With Us. These are all related and tend to lead to greater competence in the others. Even more importantly, however, they reflect my own inner journey and the nourishment and theological signposts I have needed in order to go deep within -- through and beyond my own woundedness, to the God who dwells in that place of existential loneliness and betrothal. Thus, when I am criticized for continuing to spend time writing about c 603 as though I am "unspiritual" and a legalist, for example, it hardly matters!One of the reasons I insist on the need for hermits to work regularly with a competent spiritual director is precisely to prevent one's eremitical life from assuming the first pattern as things get difficult, or tedious, or even apparently absurd, and when things are sailing along and looking fine as well! When darkness obscures the path, when God is silent (as he mostly is!), when suffering kicks up clouds of doubt and tempts to despair, or when none of these things are happening, working with a director can help one to stay the course and go deeper. A good director can also ask the questions needed or suggest the journaling that will help to get us back on our path when we have stepped off course.
Conversations with such persons can help us express both the darkness and light we experience, the struggles we must negotiate, and the failures and successes that mark and move us. Similarly, they can help us learn to listen to both ourselves and God in ways that will allow our journey to continue toward genuine wholeness and holiness. This kind of ongoing reflection, encouragement, and wisdom is critical in such a perilous and significant undertaking. It is indispensable for eremitic stability and thus, for a life that is not to be wasted in some form of self-centered dilettantism. Remaining in one's cell can, unfortunately, mean learning nothing and failing to grow as a truly loving person (a danger for every hermit), while pretending both to oneself and others to be living a demanding, authentic eremitical life. On the other hand, it truly can introduce us to the encounter and engagement with existential solitude that is essential to our humanity and to learning everything "the cell" (stability) has to teach us.